Adding How to and scientific article case recommendations

fair_app.py

@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ st.set_page_config(
 st.markdown("""
 ## A tool to assess the FAIRness of Life Cycle inventories (LCI) 🍵
 
-The questionnary is based on the [ARDC FAIR assessment tool](https://ardc.edu.au/resource/fair-data-self-assessment-tool/).
+The questionnary is based on the [ARDC FAIR assessment tool](https://ardc.edu.au/resource/fair-data-self-assessment-tool/), 
+published [here](https://github.com/au-research/FAIR-Data-Assessment-Tool).
 
 The visualization is based on [Ammar et al. 2020](https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102068).
 
@@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ class FAIR_assessment():
             self.QA_dict = {
                         'F1':{'question':'Does the dataset have any identifiers assigned?',
                               'answer':{'Globally unique, citable, and persistent (e.g. DOI, PURL, ARK or Handle)': 1,
-                                          'The dataset is part of a scientific article (with DOI)': 0.75,
+                                          # 'The dataset is part of a scientific article (with DOI)': 0.75,
                                           # 'The dataset is part of a scientific article (without DOI)': 0.5,
                                           'Web Address (URL)': 0.5,
                                           'Local Identifier': 0.25,
@@ -285,7 +286,7 @@ with tab2:
 
       with st.expander(label = 'How to use'):
             """ 
-            Each of the questoin represents one of the FAIR principles. For 
+            Each of the question represents one of the FAIR principles. For 
             each of them, check the answer that fits your dataset best.
 
             The questions present in the form come from the [ARDC FAIR assessment tool](https://ardc.edu.au/resource/fair-data-self-assessment-tool/).
@@ -309,15 +310,36 @@ with tab2:
             This section aims at helping to chose the correct answers when assessing 
             the FAIRness of a LCI from a scientific article.
 
-            article has a DOI (or other GUPI) -> F1 -> 1
 
-            article has no DOI (or other GUPI) -> F1 -> URL
+            In general, if a LCI in a part of a scientific article, we recommand 
+            to assess the FAIRness of the LCI as if you were assessing the 
+            FAIRness of the article.
 
-            we consider the article as 'metadata' of the LCI -> F2 -> 2, 3 or 4 depending on the article
 
-            DOI included in the pdf -> F3 -> yes
+            Here is a list of recommendations for a few FAIR principles regarding 
+            LCI in scientific articles.
 
-            /!\ scientific journals as repository ? -> F4 -> 2
+            __F1__: The DOI of the article (if any) can be considered as the DOi of 
+            the LCI. Otherwise, the web adress of the article should be chosen.
 
-            table in a pdf -> 
+            __F2__: The content of the article can be considered as the metadata of 
+            the LCI. Thus, the answer for F2 is dependent on the content of the 
+            article.
+
+            __F3__: If the DOI is included in the article: 'Yes', otherwise: 'No'.
+
+            __F4__: If the article has been pucblished in a scientific journal, we
+            recommand choosing 'Generalist public', 'Domain specific' repository.
+
+            __A1.1__: The access to the LCI should be considered the same as the access to
+            the scientific article (eg: scientific journal).
+
+            __A1.2__: Wether the LCI is part of the article or included in the 
+            supplementary material, we consider the data as 'File download from 
+            online location'.
+
+            __I1__: If the LCI is in the supplementary information, assess the 
+            format of the supplementary material:
+            * PDF: 'structured, open standard, non-machine-readable format'
+            * word or excel: 'proprietary format'
             """
\ No newline at end of file